Newer Used fleet bus shell vs. Older conversion bus shell with (much) less miles - Page 2
 

Newer Used fleet bus shell vs. Older conversion bus shell with (much) less miles

Started by plyonsMC9, June 29, 2017, 10:49:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

lvmci

MCI 102C3 8V92, Allison HT740
Formally MCI5A 8V71 Allison MT643
Brandon has really got it going!

TomC

This is why I'm converting my 1985 Kenworth cabover with mechanical Cat 3406B and mechanical Allison HT740. NO electronics on the truck, no EGR, and am legal smog wise in California (actually exempt). Granted electronic engines take care of themselves, but having 14 gauges help keep everything in line. Good Luck, Tomc
Tom & Donna Christman. 1985 Kenworth 40ft Super C with garage. '77 AMGeneral 10240B; 8V-71TATAIC V730.

eagle19952

Quote from: lostagain on June 30, 2017, 06:59:19 AM
The bigger bus companies, and trucking firms, replace their equipment before the warranty runs out.

JC

touche !
Donald PH
1978 Model 05 Eagle w/Torsilastic Suspension,8V71 N, DD, Allison on 24.5's 12kw Kubota.

luvrbus

Have you guys and girls ever noticed the only thing the EPA and electronic engineers have never screwed up yet is QWERTY layout of the typewriter key board  ;D it is same as it was since the late 1800's
Life is short drink the good wine first

edvanland

Now Cliff why did you say that now they will probably get on the band wagon and screw that up.
Ed Van
MCI 7
Cornville, AZ

RJ

Quote from: luvrbus on July 01, 2017, 10:55:26 AM
Have you guys and girls ever noticed the only thing the EPA and electronic engineers have never screwed up yet is QWERTY layout of the typewriter key board  ;D it is same as it was since the late 1800's

Clifford -

Unless you consider the DVORAK keyboard layout!  :o :o :o
1992 Prevost XL Vantaré Conversion M1001907 8V92T/HT-755 (DDEC/ATEC)
2003 VW Jetta TDI Sportwagon "Towed"
Cheney WA (when home)

DoubleEagle

Quote from: RJ on July 01, 2017, 01:15:41 PM
Clifford -

Unless you consider the DVORAK keyboard layout!  :o :o :o

Yes, that was the one attempt to change from Qwerty. I tried it back in the nineties, and it is more efficient. The Qwerty style supposedly was meant to slow typists down because the old mechanical keys could get jammed if you typed too fast. It never caught on because everyone's brain has been Qwertized. I still have a Dvorak keyboard if someone wants to try. I believe it was the Mavis Beacon typing program that had a Dvorak version (in DOS).  ;)
Walter
Dayton, Ohio
1975 Silvereagle Model 05, 8V71, 4 speed Spicer
1982 Eagle Model 10, 6V92, 5 speed Spicer
1984 Eagle Model 10, 6V92 w/Jacobs, Allison HT740
1994 Eagle Model 15-45, Series 60 w/Jacobs, HT746

luvrbus

I knew about the DVORAK it has been around, but has had some changes made over the years
Life is short drink the good wine first

Scott & Heather

Phil, Tom brought up a good point too, a truck conversion...they make awesome coaches. Still on my bucket list someday....(I'm 34, and two buses in so far, so maybe I can do it?)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Scott & Heather
1984 MCI 9 6V92-turbo with 9 inch roof raise (SOLD)
1992 MCI 102C3 8v92-turbo with 8 inch roof raise CURRENT HOME
Click link for 900 photos of our 1st bus conversion:
https://goo.gl/photos/GVtNRniG2RBXPuXW9

plyonsMC9

Thanks Scott & Tom,
Yes, Tom did indeed bring up a good point.  I've always been fascinated by the big truck rigs.  No argument there. 

My dream has always been the bus though.  Started when I was < 5 year's old watching buses rumble down to the Lake Sequoia YMCA mountain camp.  I can't fight it - it's my destiny.   ;D    Else it would have likely been a truck. 


re: dependability - that's a hard point re: too much electronics and not enough reliability.  We've gotten our MC9 to be extremely reliable.  And in fact the only time it has broken down in about the last decade has been when a mechanic doing maintenance or an upgrade has made a mistake (for example, not properly bleeding the coolant system).  Once we get past the mistake the bus continues to just run.  Our family and guests really appreciate that.  We do a lot of preventative maintenance but I don't mind that at all.  Wacky electronics - not so happy about that thought.


Kind Regards, Phil
Northern Arizona / 1983 - MC9, 1995 MCI DL3-45

lostagain

Electronics in vehicles have a bad reputation for sure. But you have to consider that, just like it is for mechanical engines, electronic troubles are one in a million kind of thing. For every time you hear about someones electronic problem, there are hundreds of thousands of miles being driven without trouble that aren't mentioned. I think the advantages of electronics far outweigh the negatives. Last week the mechanic at Transportation Charter Services in Calgary was showing me the multiplex diagnostic system on a 2016 Prevost. If I have a problem on the road, I call the shop, and I can tell the tech exactly where the fault is from the diagnostic display on the dash. It pinpoints which switch or module or component is at fault. The tech then knows what part to bring with him. Or it can bypass a bad spot to get me home. We have new MCI J4500s with the same kind of system. That new stuff is SO fun to drive! You have to trade them in when the warranty expires though.

Hey, I still love my 1977 MC5C.

JC
JC
Blackie AB
1977 MC5C, 6V92/HT740 (sold)
2007 Country Coach Magna, Cummins ISX (sold)

luvrbus

Lol you should the electronics on the interior coach controls in the newer Prevost conversions I posted a photo of just 1 of the control boxes on F/B measured 4x2ft x 8nches thick.
Wanting to know the price of the control panel I called the converter and asked a few questions the panel cost 65k plus labor if you replace the complete panel  ???        
Life is short drink the good wine first

Geoff

Quote from: plyonsMC9 on July 02, 2017, 01:38:46 PM
Thanks Scott & Tom,
Yes, Tom did indeed bring up a good point.  I've always been fascinated by the big truck rigs.  No argument there. 

My dream has always been the bus though.  Started when I was < 5 year's old watching buses rumble down to the Lake Sequoia YMCA mountain camp.  I can't fight it - it's my destiny.   ;D    Else it would have likely been a truck. 


re: dependability - that's a hard point re: too much electronics and not enough reliability.  We've gotten our MC9 to be extremely reliable.  And in fact the only time it has broken down in about the last decade has been when a mechanic doing maintenance or an upgrade has made a mistake (for example, not properly bleeding the coolant system).  Once we get past the mistake the bus continues to just run.  Our family and guests really appreciate that.  We do a lot of preventative maintenance but I don't mind that at all.  Wacky electronics - not so happy about that thought.


Kind Regards, Phil


If you are totally lost on the new truck/bus computer systems and make your living as a computer nerd your background can work against you.  Keeping this to buses, there are times that your computer background can work against you when you try to guess why a gauge reads high when the engine is actually running at normal temperatures.  There are times when there is a problem with old wiring causing  high readings due to rubbing of the electrical wiring.  This may show up on a 10 mile road test or it may not.  The important thing in this situation is COMMUNICATION.  If there is a problem talk to the shop that did the work--. Don't "throw then under the bus" as the old saying goes.

--Geoff
Geoff
'82 RTS AZ

oltrunt

I'm pretty much happy with the results of the "over computerization" of the new drive lines as far as driveability goes.  What I am not so keen on  (besides multiplex wiring) is the propriertary nature of the system diagnostics.  My little bus with it's Isuzu underpinnings requires a "dealer only" scanner which translates into $200 a scan etc, etc.  I can buy a dealer scanner with all the factory support new for only $3250!!!!  I'm trying to negotiate a deal on a used one for half the price--we'll see.

As it stands right now, Good Sam will drag my broken down bus to the nearest safe haven where there probably won't be an Isuzu dealer to read codes and where storage fees and "lets throw this part at it" service will soon add up.  One way or another, all of us with "modern" computerized buses will have to address this problem.

Jack :(

Geoff

Quote from: oltrunt on July 03, 2017, 06:39:19 PM
I'm pretty much happy with the results of the "over computerization" of the new drive lines as far as driveability goes.  What I am not so keen on  (besides multiplex wiring) is the propriertary nature of the system diagnostics.  My little bus with it's Isuzu underpinnings requires a "dealer only" scanner which translates into $200 a scan etc, etc.  I can buy a dealer scanner with all the factory support new for only $3250!!!!  I'm trying to negotiate a deal on a used one for half the price--we'll see.

As it stands right now, Good Sam will drag my broken down bus to the nearest safe haven where there probably won't be an Isuzu dealer to read codes and where storage fees and "lets throw this part at it" service will soon add up.  One way or another, all of us with "modern" computerized buses will have to address this problem.

Jack :(

Beware the scanner software and hardware!  I got taken by an eBay seller from China that sent me a small briefcase of connector plugs and software to analyze the different trucks/offroad/engines etc. only to find out you had to be a DEALER to gain access to the internet support that the software was supposed to access and give you the fault codes. 

--Geoff
Geoff
'82 RTS AZ