BCM Community

Bus Discussion => Bus Topics ( click here for quick start! ) => Topic started by: Scott & Heather on November 26, 2016, 08:20:43 PM

Title: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: Scott & Heather on November 26, 2016, 08:20:43 PM
I am not an online arguer. I consider it childish, but I got sucked into the BCM facebook page argument over using multi weight oil in a two stroke. I can't handle it over there. So many people who know nothing going off saying how Lucas and Amsoil are Gods gift to two strokes and will make your bus fly and float. Just blowing steam....sigh. I feel much better. I'm memorizing who is saying what because I don't want to buy their buses someday....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: RJ on November 26, 2016, 08:29:37 PM
Scott -

Yup, don't let Gary suck you in with his Amsoil ravings!  (I have fun yanking his chain and getting him all hot and bothered!)  ;D

OTOH, using synthetics for everything else but the engine seems to be widely accepted.

Stick to the majors and you'll be ok: Mobile Delvac 1240, Chevron Delo 100 and Shell Rotella T.

FWIW & HTH. . .

;)
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: luvrbus on November 27, 2016, 05:14:51 AM
LOL I passed on that one aren't proud of me RJ  ;D ;D
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: Scott Crosby on November 27, 2016, 05:31:01 AM
My friend uses delo 400 40 wt... and the bottles he has actually say CF2 on them I was shocked. 
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: luvrbus on November 27, 2016, 05:45:09 AM
Quote from: Scott Crosby on November 27, 2016, 05:31:01 AM
My friend uses delo 400 40 wt... and the bottles he has actually say CF2 on them I was shocked. 

Wow somebody finally read the jug
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: Oonrahnjay on November 27, 2016, 05:45:51 AM
Quote from: luvrbus on November 27, 2016, 05:14:51 AMLOL I passed on that one aren't proud of me RJ  ;D ;D 

      Where's the popcorn???
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: Scott Crosby on November 27, 2016, 06:23:18 AM
Not all the 400 jugs say cf2.   I've looked and some don't.
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: luvrbus on November 27, 2016, 06:46:05 AM
Quote from: Scott Crosby on November 27, 2016, 06:23:18 AM
Not all the 400 jugs say cf2.   I've looked and some don't.

Nope some jugs will say for MTU l and MTU ll engines and on the Delo 400 15/40 label they drop the MTU ll engine.To much is made of the ash content and I am not a Delo fan anyways.  

When we could buy real diesel fuel the red for off road use we had to use oil with a ash content of 1.24% to make the TBN jive that was DD spec
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: boxcarOkie on November 27, 2016, 07:58:48 AM
Fakebook is chocked full of "Right-Fighters" and usually a total waste of one's time ... period.

Clifford will gladly testify that if there is NO OIL under my bus, it is out.

While I am at it.  Happy Birthday you old coot (Isn't that coming up tomorrow?) and what is thing I am hearing about "a two-stroke list?"

<><><>
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: luvrbus on November 27, 2016, 08:18:14 AM
Don, don't push the birthday wishes it is next week lol boy times fly's  ??? 
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: Dave5Cs on November 27, 2016, 09:52:35 AM
Butter Bruce?.....
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: luvrbus on November 27, 2016, 10:00:19 AM
Quote from: Dave5Cs on November 27, 2016, 09:52:35 AM
Butter Bruce?.....


LOL for the one on F/B you need a Coke and a Milky Way just butter and popcorn won't hack it  ;D ;D ;D it happens every few months over there last time I looked there was over 50 replies most were all different in opinions 
Title: Re:
Post by: Van on November 27, 2016, 10:57:05 AM
C'mon really? Aren't all oils oily?

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: daddysgirl on November 27, 2016, 11:04:43 AM
I was always under the school of thought that dictated 40w...drive it like you're trying to kill it (I don't do that one) and indeed, if there is nothing leaking...the bus is out of oil :)
These are not regular engines
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: TomC on November 27, 2016, 11:12:50 AM
Standard Oil worked with General Motors and invented the 30, 40, 50 weight Delo 100 specifically for use in the 2 stroke Diesels. I've seen the magic 15W-40 can do to the inner workings of the engines. If you want to do premature overhauls at around 150,000mi, rather than having an engine last upwards towards 500,000mi before overhaul, then please use the 15W-40.
When I first bought my 1980 KW with 8V-92TA, 15W-40 was recommended and 100,000mi oil change with changing oil filters every 25,000mi. That was rather quickly retracted and the straight weight 30 (cold weather), 40 or 50 weight (mostly generator and mining engines) was recommended. Good Luck, TomC
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: Scott & Heather on November 27, 2016, 11:18:23 AM
I'm currently running Rotella 50 weight in my 8v92 and the Bus loves it excellent oil pressure at all times. Very very little oil consumption. There's a guy over on Facebook right now who is saying he got 2,000,000 miles out of an 8V92 running 15-40 in it.  I call bunk


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: luvrbus on November 27, 2016, 12:15:36 PM
LOL you want get 2,000,000 miles from 8v92 running gold in it you are lucky if you can get 400,000 from one before a inframe 
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: luvrbus on November 27, 2016, 12:26:03 PM
Delo 100 was developed for the 149 series in the 60's a totally different 2 stroke engine with pods and overhead cams, FWIW,Delo RPM was the oil used in the 71 series before the 100 sales pitch came along.

Funny people rant and rage about the ash content and weight of the oil then don't care what diesel fuel one buys 
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: daddysgirl on November 27, 2016, 12:47:08 PM
Is there a link to the Facebook discussion? The link I found was more about showcasing different builds.
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: Oonrahnjay on November 27, 2016, 02:41:11 PM
Quote from: Dave5Cs on November 27, 2016, 09:52:35 AMButter Bruce?..... 

        Yes, please ... water, hops, and best Barley Malt, too!!
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: Iceni John on November 27, 2016, 03:00:53 PM
Quote from: luvrbus on November 27, 2016, 12:26:03 PM
Delo 100 was developed for the 149 series in the 60's a totally different 2 stroke engine with pods and overhead cams, FWIW,Delo RPM was the oil used in the 71 series before the 100 sales pitch came along.

Funny people rant and rage about the ash content and weight of the oil then don't care what diesel fuel one buys 
Our Heavy Equipment Mechanic at work has a drum of RPM that he's trying to find a home for.   I was hesitant about buying some of it because I couldn't find any info about it, but if it's OK for our 2-strokes I'll consider buying an oil change or two's worth of it.   What's the difference between RPM and 100?

John
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: luvrbus on November 27, 2016, 04:25:37 PM
Quote from: Iceni John on November 27, 2016, 03:00:53 PM
Our Heavy Equipment Mechanic at work has a drum of RPM that he's trying to find a home for.   I was hesitant about buying some of it because I couldn't find any info about it, but if it's OK for our 2-strokes I'll consider buying an oil change or two's worth of it.   What's the difference between RPM and 100?

John

If it is not the RPM S- 3 it will work for you. John the RPM S-3 was a high detergent for Cat engines,the regular old RPM was a non-detergent that Detroit's used back then , the Delo 100 hit the market 1967 the RPM was used from 1941 up till then
Title: Re: Facebook argument over multi-weight oil
Post by: Dave5Cs on November 27, 2016, 07:08:33 PM
Coming up!... ::) :D