C'mon mods. With this software (great by the way) you should be able to post a PP at least twice, if not three times the current settings. I'd like to see how far along some of my old friends have come along with thier conversion without having to go to a picture thread. Or pulling out a microscope...LOL ;D
Just a suggestion ::)
Greg,
One of the reasons that the photo upload is limited is that many people are using dial up connections.
If you can't get a good enough resolution at 128Kb per photo, I really apologize. But we do have to think of the overall readership, not just those with fast connections.
Dallas
Greg,
Can you post your website here, I can't get your personal info link to work.
Devin
Quote from: Devin on September 02, 2006, 07:41:48 PM
Greg,
Can you post your website here, I can't get your personal info link to work.
Devin
Sure. I left out 1 "g: in Greg ;D and have corrected the addy in my profile. But here you go.
http://community.webshots.com/user/greggpaciga
Quote from: Dallas on September 02, 2006, 07:21:04 PM
Greg,
One of the reasons that the photo upload is limited is that many people are using dial up connections.
If you can't get a good enough resolution at 128Kb per photo, I really apologize. But we do have to think of the overall readership, not just those with fast connections.
Dallas
Not meaning to bicker with you dallas. But the term "overall" would mean majority my friend. And I would have to think the majority of folks here would be running DSL or cable in this day and age. Just a thought. ;D
That would be an interesting survey somebody!
Who is using dialup, and at what speed, and who is using one of the faster methods of connection.
Richard
Quote from: Greg Paciga (S.Ga) on September 03, 2006, 04:27:37 AM
Quote from: Dallas on September 02, 2006, 07:21:04 PM
Greg,
One of the reasons that the photo upload is limited is that many people are using dial up connections.
If you can't get a good enough resolution at 128Kb per photo, I really apologize. But we do have to think of the overall readership, not just those with fast connections.
Dallas
Not meaning to bicker with you dallas. But the term "overall" would mean majority my friend. And I would have to think the majority of folks here would be running DSL or cable in this day and age. Just a thought. ;D
Quote from: Greg Paciga (S.Ga) on September 03, 2006, 04:27:37 AM
Quote from: Dallas on September 02, 2006, 07:21:04 PM
Greg,
One of the reasons that the photo upload is limited is that many people are using dial up connections.
If you can't get a good enough resolution at 128Kb per photo, I really apologize. But we do have to think of the overall readership, not just those with fast connections.
Dallas
Not meaning to bicker with you dallas. But the term "overall" would mean majority my friend. And I would have to think the majority of folks here would be running DSL or cable in this day and age. Just a thought. ;D
Quote from: Greg Paciga (S.Ga) on September 03, 2006, 04:27:37 AM
Greg, To me, "Overall" doesn't mean separating different aspects, in my opinion, it means to include all aspects of the population.
Here are the definitions from encarta.
I didn't include the noun as it refers to a garment.
o·ver·all [ ṓvər àwl ]
adjective,
adverb
Definition:
1. end to end: from one extremity to the other
2. total: including everything
adjective
Definition:
general: considered as a whole
an overall impression
adverb
Definition:
1. generally: in general
Overall, we were disappointed with the results.
2. considering everything: taking everything into account
The frozen foods side of the business overall saw a lo......
Quote from: Greg Paciga (S.Ga) on September 03, 2006, 04:27:37 AM
... I would have to think the majority of folks here would be running DSL or cable in this day and age. Just a thought. ;D
At home perhaps. But when travelling often not. When I am on the road I usualy just have dial up. (I travel cheap so I have more money to put into my new bus conversion project :P ;) )